3 ms·
I keep reading that the sex was consensual and that it's the fact he didn't use protection that made it a crime. I don't really understand how this can be the c
by mike-cardwell 16y ago
I keep reading that the sex was consensual and that it's the fact he didn't use protection that made it a crime. I don't really understand how this can be the case though, but it seems to be all over the place if you google it. Sweden must have a very strange law.
- nhangen 16y agoI scoured the web and read a bit about the case. It seems that one of the "victims" isn't complaining, though the 2nd is. I'm not going to play PI, but it seems to me that if a woman is that upset after sex, then something went wrong. Maybe he refused to spoon.
- mike-cardwell 16y agoWhatever it was, it doesn't sound like anything which could be classified as an assault, sexual or otherwise.
- nhangen 16y agoIsn't that what the trial is supposed to find out? I don't know a lot about the UK justice system, but I imagine they wouldn't issue a warrant without something to bring to the trial.