4 ms·
Jude from Golden. Beyond the blog post in terms of more learning content - video and extensive further reading links can help in this area but at the core much
by judegomila 7y ago
Jude from Golden. Beyond the blog post in terms of more learning content - video and extensive further reading links can help in this area but at the core much deeper pages eg https://golden.com/wiki/Cryobacterium https://golden.com/wiki/Cryobacterium vs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryobacterium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryobacterium
In terms of numbers of contributors we believe Golden is at the stage where 1 hour editing on Golden produces more content/data than alternatives and the friction to edit is much lower. Are you looking for more depth on comparisons beyond the blog post?
- hk__2 7y ago> In terms of numbers of contributors we believe Golden is at the stage where 1 hour editing on Golden produces more content/data than alternatives and the friction to edit is much lower. In my experience as a Wikipedia editor, 80% of the time I spend writing an article is searching for (good) sources; 10% is editing friction like looking for the right infobox or the right model for what I want (although that time is reduced by experience); 10% is actually writing the article. Wikipedia’s contributing documentation discoverability is quite bad. Your “high resolution” citations is a really great idea I wish WP would had. Does it support having multiple citations for the same part of the content? Overlaping parts?