3 ms·
Given than Wikidata is published under a CC 0 licence there’s nothing preventing Golden from using it as a knowledge source. Unless Golden provides a better edi
by hk__2 8y ago
Given than Wikidata is published under a CC 0 licence there’s nothing preventing Golden from using it as a knowledge source. Unless Golden provides a better editor experience I see no reason for anyone to contribute to Golden rather than Wikidata.
- jake-low 8y agoJust FYI, most of the content on Wikipedia is actually dual licensed under CC-BY-SA and GFDL. Both licenses are copyleft licenses; CC0 is more permissive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reusing_Wikipedia_content https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reusing_Wikipedia_co...
- yorwba 8y agoParts of Wikipedia articles (e.g. some infoboxes [1]) are actually sourced from Wikidata, which is licensed under CC0 [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_person/Wikidata https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_person/Wikida... [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Data_access#Basic_important_things_to_know https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Data_access#Basic_imp...
- hk__2 8y agoYes, but I’m talking about Wikidata (CC0), not Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA).
- jake-low 8y agoWhoops, I misread your comment! Sorry about that.