4 ms·

Jude from Golden here. Good question. We are opening up useful queries over time for users eg https://golden.com/y-combinator-w19-companies/ https://golden.com/

Jude from Golden here. Good question. We are opening up useful queries over time for users eg https://golden.com/y-combinator-w19-companies/ https://golden.com/y-combinator-w19-companies/ Future paid/business tools will include using our AI assisted editor for private companies, private storage of their knowledge so we can continue to open up more queries to the public. Our north star is to get to a more open knowledge base than what is currently available. Also here are all the cryptocurrency projects that have whitepapers https://golden.com/cryptocurrency-whitepapers/ https://golden.com/cryptocurrency-whitepapers/

hk__2 7y ago
Given than Wikidata is published under a CC 0 licence there’s nothing preventing Golden from using it as a knowledge source. Unless Golden provides a better editor experience I see no reason for anyone to contribute to Golden rather than Wikidata.
- jake-low 7y ago
  Just FYI, most of the content on Wikipedia is actually dual licensed under CC-BY-SA and GFDL. Both licenses are copyleft licenses; CC0 is more permissive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reusing_Wikipedia_content https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reusing_Wikipedia_co...
  - yorwba 7y ago
    Parts of Wikipedia articles (e.g. some infoboxes [1]) are actually sourced from Wikidata, which is licensed under CC0 [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_person/Wikidata https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_person/Wikida... [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Data_access#Basic_important_things_to_know https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Data_access#Basic_imp...
  - hk__2 7y ago
    Yes, but I’m talking about Wikidata (CC0), not Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA).
    - jake-low 7y ago
      Whoops, I misread your comment! Sorry about that.