3 ms·
Considering that the ground truth comes from humans I would say that humans always outperform NN's and that results which show otherwise are demonstrating the l
by sgt101 8y ago
Considering that the ground truth comes from humans I would say that humans always outperform NN's and that results which show otherwise are demonstrating the limitations of the data set or testing process.
- leesec 8y agoIt's been proven that using humans as ground truth you can ultimately build a NN off that data which outperforms the humans.
- sgt101 8y agoWhat is meant by proven? What is meant by "the humans"? And how can any human say that is so?
- woadwarrior01 8y agoBecause an ensemble of humans can usually outperform a single human (quite like in artificial neural nets). One way to do it would be to setup a sufficiently large majority-voting ensemble of human classifiers.
- leesec 8y agoI mean, for example, you take 5 expert radiologists, and average their assessments when scoring an image, and your train a NN to predict those averaged scores, and with enough data the NN will beat any single selected doctor in accuracy.