3 ms·
I find it most interesting to use tools like this to augment - not replace diagnosticians and specialists. Of course the key here is that the training set is c
by mikehollinger 7y ago
I find it most interesting to use tools like this to augment - not replace diagnosticians and specialists.
Of course the key here is that the training set is crucial to building a high quality model - which of course needs a set of specialists to give their consensus on the diagnosis of the patient based on the images.
Presuming those folks can agree - the technology becomes a force multiplier for good. If they disagree or label things problematically - they become a force multiplier for bad.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- sgt101 7y agoSo long as the system is implemented in such as way as to stop it becoming a crutch or a default. If it's a tool in the flow then I think such things (not this one given the expert review information in this thread?) might be very valuable.