4 ms·
Did you read the article? It is not primarily about the pharmaceutical industry, or about doctoring results, although it touches on both of those topics. The
by michael_dorfman 16y ago
Did you read the article? It is not primarily about the pharmaceutical industry, or about doctoring results, although it touches on both of those topics. The argument is far more subtle, and more far-reaching.
- drndown2007 16y agoAgreed. The one that has me wondering how far off we might be is the idea that radioactive decay might not be constant: http://io9.com/5619954/the-sun-is-changing-the-rate-of-radioactive-decay-and-breaking-the-rules-of-chemistry http://io9.com/5619954/the-sun-is-changing-the-rate-of-radio...
- bugsy 16y agoThat too demonstrates the scientific method in action. Experiments showed that the prevailing paradigm is likely flawed. Now we know more.