3 ms·

Nope. Any other way around ?

• skilled 7y ago
  Works fine for me.
  • generalpf 7y ago
    Doesn’t work for me either. Different paywall.
• mrb 7y ago
  On desktop Chrome: switch to mobile view (ctrl-shift-j then ctrl-shift-m) AND browse to https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/google-parent-posts-rare-misses-as-revenue-comes-up-short-11556569259 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/google... This works for me. WSJ implements a "soft paywall" that looks at various signals to determine whether it should let you see the content. These signatures include among other things: IP address, User-Agent, cookies, etc. So if you switch one of these things it gives you one more chance to bypass the paywall (eg. mobile view changes the User-Agent). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19703810 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19703810 In my particular case switching to firefox, or trying icognito mode doesn't work. I really have to switch to mobile view.
• deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
• gopher2 7y ago
  WSJ article isn't long. This covers all the same stuff https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/29/alphabet-earnings-q1-2019.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/29/alphabet-earnings-q1-2019.ht...