3 ms·
He mentions, among other things,studies in ESP as falling prey to this mysterious "well it worked the first time" syndrome. Now maybe the other examples are mo
by burgerbrain 16y ago
He mentions, among other things,studies in ESP as falling prey to this mysterious "well it worked the first time" syndrome.
Now maybe the other examples are more credible, but mixing bullshit like ESP in doesn't help your case at all.
- michael_dorfman 16y agoActually, it does. The likelihood that ESP actually works is significantly less than the likelihood of "the decline effect", which is explained by a number of perfectly rational factors (touched upon in the article.) If you want to claim that "ESP is bullshit" (as you and I both do, I imagine), you somehow need to account for those (rare) studies which oddly enough seem to support an ESP effect at a statistically significant level. "The decline effect" goes a ways toward providing this explanation.
- drndown2007 16y agoThis article is one example (pre-cognition as opposed to ESP, but in the same vein): http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/precognition-real-cornell-university-lab-releases-powerful-new-evidence-human-mind-can- http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/precognition-real-corn... I think it comes down to we don't know nearly as much about our little existence as we like to think.
- khafra 16y agoIn other words, parapsychology is the control group for science: http://lesswrong.com/lw/1ib/parapsychology_the_control_group_for_science/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/1ib/parapsychology_the_control_group...