4 ms·
> It's especially frightening because this data could be used to deny people reasonable insurance rates in the future and they weren't even aware they were bein
by jlarocco 8y ago
> It's especially frightening because this data could be used to deny people reasonable insurance rates in the future and they weren't even aware they were being logged.
More expensive insurance is getting off easy. After getting caught two or three times people should lose their license over it, IMO. It's as dangerous as drunk driving.
That said, it is concerning how they're collecting this information.
- stcredzero 8y agoDoes the state of California believe that people have "a reasonable expectation of privacy" inside their cars while driving on the road?
- jlarocco 8y agoNo idea, I don't live in California.
- jfk13 8y agoIn terms of driving behavior? I should hope not. If I'm driving down the road with a phone held to my ear, a giant soda in the other hand, and steering with my knees, and I happen to pass a police officer, I hope they'd be allowed to stop me. I shouldn't be able to hide behind "I was in my private car, you had no right to look in on me and observe my behavior there."
- stcredzero 8y agoIf I'm driving down the road with a phone held to my ear, a giant soda in the other hand, and steering with my knees, and I happen to pass a police officer, I hope they'd be allowed to stop me Some expectation of privacy probably applies to conversations inside the car. Also, there might be a different way to think about the entire record of behavior of where one drives. Neither of those would interfere with policing of the behavior you cite.
- Spooky23 8y agoNo. Anything that isn't in a locked trunk is in public view. Driving is a privilege, not a right.