3 ms·
In the sense that they're not giving these customers what they want, they're being incompetent, but I think it's totally unreasonable in the first place to dema
by jimmaswell 8y ago
In the sense that they're not giving these customers what they want, they're being incompetent, but I think it's totally unreasonable in the first place to demand such total separation. Like caring if the same coffee machine was used for non-free-trade coffee grounds before you used it for your own grounds, or that a non-cage-free egg was made on the same grill earlier in the day when you ordered cage-free.
- scruple 8y ago> I think it's totally unreasonable in the first place to demand such total separation. Look it, no one is demanding anything. They're mis-representing their product. That's all that I'm saying. The end. Everything else you're saying, your railing against the so-called "vegan moral framework," etc..., is, to me, just you grinding an axe.
- Rooster61 8y ago> but I think it's totally unreasonable in the first place to demand such total separation I can't say I agree with this sentiment. This sort of thing happens in other food service outlets and it's never bothered me. The one that comes to mind is grocery stores having separate slicers for meat and dairy to accommodate those who keep kosher. I'm not Jewish, and neither am I a vegetarian, but I wouldn't call those who do keep such lifestyle choices unreasonable. Also, the word demand here commands more than one meaning. If there is demand for such a separation, and money to be made from accommodating that demand, those practices will find their way into the market.
- jimmaswell 8y agoI did say religious concerns and allergies have more merit for full separation than vegan/vegetarian preference to have no animal matter touch the food. My issue is it's a waste of resources to have two grills just for this.