> His claim comes down to the U.S. government not being able to use any license which relies on copyright claims You haven't read his claim then, he explicitly

> His claim comes down to the U.S. government not being able to use any license which relies on copyright claims You haven't read his claim then, he explicitly isn't saying that. He claims only that the government can't use the OFL because of the specific demands made by the OFL which the government can't satisfy. FSF licenses don't mind public domain contributions, the same is not true of the OFL.