2 ms·

I see what you're saying - "you can't be racist against some people." It seems unfair because I guess you're thinking of situations where then subjugated races

I see what you're saying - "you can't be racist against some people." It seems unfair because I guess you're thinking of situations where then subjugated races can then be racist towards non subjugated ones? Obviously the answer is that nobody can be racist towards anybody and be pure to a positive read of the sjw cause, but humans gonna human. I will say that from a utile standpoint white vs black racism is far more harmful than black vs white, in the reality of 2019, so outside the rhetorical realm of debate of pure morals. Therefore I'm not sure even the existence of "reverse racism" (terrible term but the most universally understood to describe my meaning) SJWs does not indicate an sjw desire to create hierarchy. The best description of an ideal sjw future I believe was captured and described in Walkaway, by Cory doctorow. I believe he offers the full text for free on his website.

weberc2 8y ago
> It seems unfair because I guess you're thinking of situations where then subjugated races can then be racist towards non subjugated ones? It's not a question of "fairness"; it's a question of whether or not the ideology is a racial ideology, and the quoted slogan (in context) is considerable evidence that it is. Because (lawyering aside), the slogan is a pronouncement it morally permissible to treat members of one race worse than members of other races. > The best description of an ideal sjw future I believe was captured and described in Walkaway, by Cory doctorow Thank you for the recommendation; will check it out.