4 ms·
Well, I doubt they'll reject clients based on the use they intend to give to their product, but I can't really fault them for that. It seems like a legitimate b
by jolmg 8y ago
Well, I doubt they'll reject clients based on the use they intend to give to their product, but I can't really fault them for that. It seems like a legitimate business. Hardly unethical.
- gbrown 8y agoPerhaps we could imagine better privacy laws. The fact that something is legal, and a legitimate business, doesn't mean that it's good or should be allowed.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- mixmastamyk 8y agoWithout explicit permission given.
- chrismeller 8y agoMost (all?) of their examples in the FAQ are related to corporate drivers, not individuals. Something like Uber would be a bit of a gray area since you use your own vehicle, but all the others are more like DHL and FedEx, where you're driving a company-provided vehicle and there should be no expectation of privacy in regards to how you operate that vehicle.
- gbrown 8y agoThose are the examples given, but that wouldn't explain the huge numbers claimed elsewhere - nearly a quarter of phones in the US. Pardon me for not assuming that a data gathering corporation has my best interests at heart.
- dillonmckay 8y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope This was legit, too.