> … comparable programs… For someones definition of "comparable". > How can I show what a website doesn't do? You can try to show your claim — "… chooses to

> … comparable programs… For someones definition of "comparable". > How can I show what a website doesn't do? You can try to show your claim — "… chooses to present data in some aggregate way that seems to defy any familiar forms of aggregation and reasoning…" — has some basis in reality. > … when something means nothing other than itself, we say it has no meaning. That may be what you say. Show why we should think that's what people interested in "Why did Clojure gain so much popularity?" would say. > … why not compare the second fastest programs between languages instead of the fastest? Inexplicable! Or obvious: there would need to be two programs for each, rather than one. > Anyway, we're going in circles. I agree, you repeat your assertions without establishing anything.