5 ms·
Let me ask, do you think that the content of my message reduces to "graphical user interfaces are harder to use than CLI"?
by colbyrussell 7y ago
Let me ask, do you think that the content of my message reduces to "graphical user interfaces are harder to use than CLI"?
- diminoten 7y agoYes, I do!
- colbyrussell 7y agoPlease explain how you got there, because I'm at a loss. Both examples involve using the CLI. The GitHub version I ran through actually includes more CLI steps. How could that possibly have been my intention?
- diminoten 7y agoYour references to clicking repeatedly, and the general fact that github.com's innovation is the GUI it puts on top of a git workflow.
- colbyrussell 7y agoI'm mystified about what's going on right now. Both versions involve clicking. Both versions involve command-line steps. The difference is that the GitHub version requires more of both, needlessly. That's the point of what I wrote. That's the only point. I don't understand this context where I'm being forced to defend an argument that's been foisted upon me and that I never made and never even thought of trying to make.
- diminoten 7y agoI'm sorry you don't understand it, but you don't get to ignore the implications that spawn off of your argument just because they're inconvenient.
- colbyrussell 7y agoWhat? You get to imagine some bad argument that would make it most convenient for you, and then demand that I defend that argument, as if it were one that I wanted to make? This is what I'm responsible for? Dealing with someone who resorts to strawmanning the person/idea at the other end when challenged?
- diminoten 7y agoI'm not imagining it, and that's the problem you're running into. It's a consequence of what you said.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- dllthomas 7y agoIt's not a direct consequence of anything that was said. It's a possible implication - in the conversational sense of implication, not the logical sense - but those get to be disclaimed.
- diminoten 7y agoHis stance is literally that using a GUI is harder. That isn't a consequence, it's his core position.
- colbyrussell 7y agoIt's literally not my stance. And I've literally said that it's not my stance—in a comment (that should have never been necessary to begin with) meant to remove all doubt. And you know this. To continue saying otherwise (explicitly, even) is a case of outright intellectual dishonesty.
- diminoten 7y ago
- dllthomas 7y agoThe patch version only involves clicking when sending an email with an attachment involves clicking, right?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]