3 ms·
> I would really hate to deal with a second level of bureaucracy when it comes to promotions and such.... I was imagining it more as peer-accreditation and pee
by CharlesColeman 7y ago
> I would really hate to deal with a second level of bureaucracy when it comes to promotions and such....
I was imagining it more as peer-accreditation and peer-participation, as the other union members would be your peers. Basically more democracy rather than bureaucracy.
- joshuamorton 7y agoSure, but in many ways Google's promo process is already this way. Its not perfect, but at least IME, my promotion/performance evaluation has been based significantly on feedback from my peers.
- CharlesColeman 7y ago> my promotion/performance evaluation has been based significantly on feedback from my peers "Based significantly on" is not the same as "made by" or "made in collaboration with." The problem here is an employer using their discretion as a hidden means of retaliation, and they can still do that with all the feedback in the world as long as the discretion is still all theirs.
- joshuamorton 7y agoRemoving employer discretion is not a solvable problem.
- CharlesColeman 7y agoI didn't say remove, I said spread it around so it's harder to use improperly.