They will probably think it's crude and ineffective, but it's the best they had at the time, and at least they weren't testing on humans ( at least cruel and/or

They will probably think it's crude and ineffective, but it's the best they had at the time, and at least they weren't testing on humans ( at least cruel and/or unnecessary unimportant testing. The real travesty here is sensationalized headline and mis-directed reporting as a relevant correlation for humans. - It's all about the click/eyes, with no real substance for the reader