3 ms·
I know it's not your responsibility at all but the only thing that stopped me from using it was the pain in the ass that is configuring s3 itself. I will get to
by Trufa 7y ago
I know it's not your responsibility at all but the only thing that stopped me from using it was the pain in the ass that is configuring s3 itself. I will get to it eventually cause I'm not very happy with filestack's UI but it was so quick to get it working and I was in a hurry.
- kvz 7y agoIf you value time over money, you could also use Uppy in conjunction with Transloadit, our company can handle uploading, encoding, and exporting to S3 for you, too. If you want to save money then yes, you could configure direct S3 uploading with Uppy, we do have better examples fot that these days (e.g. we now also show back-end code for signing the requests) However it seems you got it working now so maybe no reason to change?