4 ms·
It's always struck me that the story about 'men keeping women off the workplace; rampant sexism' etc . never truly captured the whole story. Sure feminism itsel
by throwaw312321 8y ago
It's always struck me that the story about 'men keeping women off the workplace; rampant sexism' etc . never truly captured the whole story. Sure feminism itself has historically played handmaiden to forces who wanted to see lower wages and higher consumerism, but somehow there is not even an acknowledgement of this today.
The talking points always assume that fundamental human tasks like raising a family is infinitely more despicable than working as a drone in a corporation. I'm amused that the powers that be push the story that doing what is often a pointless chore, often for mere survival in contemporary times, is somehow 'more fulfilling' than the above.
This is not entirely surprising, since family has essentially become nationalized, while state is being privatised. Orwell's world will probably come into existence due more to reasons that far more insipid and glacial in its accumulation, than those 'big bang' events like terrorism. The latter no doubt are setting up crucial infrastructure for these, but the social aspect is has a much larger time constant.
- mikekchar 8y agoI notice you've used a throwaway account for your opinion, but I'm willing to potentially burn a little karma and say that I agree with you. When I worked in the local high school, I had an American colleague who went absolutely mad when one of the students offered up that she wanted to be a housewife as her career. Comments like, "How can you throw your life away?" drove that student to tears. This is not to say that I don't understand the risks of giving up an early industrial career in order to run a household, but I've got to say that I think an enlightened society should find a way to make that a viable option: no matter what your gender is.