4 ms·
Besides microclimites, which are a whole other discussion, predictions vary per service. It looks like AccuWeather has a 2% better rating for San Francisco, it
by ravedave5 7y ago
Besides microclimites, which are a whole other discussion, predictions vary per service. It looks like AccuWeather has a 2% better rating for San Francisco, it's not much but it's something. https://www.forecastadvisor.com/California/SanFrancisco/94128/ https://www.forecastadvisor.com/California/SanFrancisco/9412...
but compared to a smaller city also with microclimates on a large body of water the prediction for San Fran is 15% better - https://www.forecastadvisor.com/Minnesota/Duluth/55811/ https://www.forecastadvisor.com/Minnesota/Duluth/55811/
- freehunter 7y agoThat's the first time I've seen that site, and for my city it's kind of frustrating if it's true. The Weather Channel rates the best (by far) compared to my preferred app, but I find The Weather Channel app to be an awful user experience for how I want to see weather presented to me.
- myama 7y agoThe Weather.com data is sold to Google, Facebook and many others. Perhaps you find a better user experience on those platforms?