> Marginalizing it certainly makes it less appealing because it's clear it's not widely socially acceptable. So, how did the 18th Amendment in the United State

> Marginalizing it certainly makes it less appealing because it's clear it's not widely socially acceptable. So, how did the 18th Amendment in the United States, i.e. Prohibition, work out? Surely, the broad public support and commitment to marginalizing alcohol, enough to get a constitutional amendment passed (no small feat), has been successful in making the US a booze-free country today? No? Marginalization only works if it's something people aren't deeply committed to and tribalism, the root of many of these toxic behaviors, is far too deeply ingrained in human nature for marginalization to work.