4 ms·
In the original article author's defense, I think his argument does scale out properly to large portion of the population, who have no need to print anything m
by julianlam 8y ago
In the original article author's defense, I think his argument does scale out properly to large portion of the population, who have no need to print anything more than documents. On the off chance (once a year?) something needs to be printed in high quality paper with colour, I'd jog down to the local Kinkos/Staples instead.
If you print colour-coded diagrams regularly, then the cost-benefit analysis falls apart, but I would argue that you might be a smaller part of the general population than you expect.
I maintain a single Brother household MFC, had it for nearly a decade, changed the toner twice, drum never. We print notes, documents, and legal contracts for work, etc... even the occasional diagram that gets put in the print queue doesn't _need_ to be in colour. It'd certainly be nice, but it's not a dealbreaker either.
- 5580 8y agoI print color documents all of the time on my home (Dell C1710nw) laser printer. The necessity of color is heavily dependent upon which type of documents are being printed. Life isn't monochromatic for me. Now at work there are only rare occasions that I print anything at all, preferring electronic copies of everything. When I do print, most everything is monochrome.