9 ms·
This reason is why, in some parts of the US, traffic court convictions for moving violations (i.e., run red light) carries both a monetary fine and a demerit po
by pwg 8y ago
This reason is why, in some parts of the US, traffic court convictions for moving violations (i.e., run red light) carries both a monetary fine and a demerit points allocation against your license.
Exceed some small demerit points limit over a defined time period and your can be ordered into driver school or have your license suspended.
https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/drivers/#points_you.asp https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/drivers/#points_you.asp
With the points system, a "rich dude" who see's a $500 red light fine as pocket change can't simply run red lights as long as they see fit. If the monetary fine is not itself a deterrence, the demerit points then become the deterrence.
- DangitBobby 8y agoThen what is the point of the fine at all, if the demerit points turn out to be the real deterrent? And if the cash is also supposed to be a real deterrent, why not make it so for said rich dude?
- pwg 8y agoThe cynical viewpoint says the fine is there for 'revenue generation' purposes.
- DangitBobby 8y agoYou're right, of course. But a progressive income-based fine would generate even more revenue and wouldn't disproportionately affect those with lower income.