4 ms·
Layer 2 is not decentralized. POS is not decentralized Sharding has a unstoppable risk of a 51% attack. Ethereum has failed.
by robertAngst 7y ago
Layer 2 is not decentralized.
POS is not decentralized
Sharding has a unstoppable risk of a 51% attack.
Ethereum has failed.
- ericb 7y ago> POS is not decentralized huh? > Sharding has a unstoppable risk of a 51% attack. So does bitcoin?
- robertAngst 7y agoPOS uses few users to validate transactions. This is not decentralized. > Sharding has a unstoppable risk of a 51% attack. >So does bitcoin? Bitcoin cost of 51 percent attack is ~400k for 1 hour. ETH is 90k for 1 hour. https://www.crypto51.app/ https://www.crypto51.app/
- ericb 7y ago> Bitcoin cost of 51 percent attack is ~400k for 1 hour. ETH is 90k for 1 hour. Seems not wildly different to me and nearly the same order of magnitude, and you are also admitting that 51% is a concern for Bitcoin, so it sounds like we're agreeing now! > POS uses few users to validate transactions. The "few" can be quite a large number, and those same validators are by definition very invested.