5 ms·
Because I'm sure there are no national security benefits from having your rival route their communications over your infrastructure in such a way that you can c
by DuskStar 8y ago
Because I'm sure there are no national security benefits from having your rival route their communications over your infrastructure in such a way that you can cripple them in a conflict.
- factsaresacred 8y ago> Boeing said it...was neither possible nor required by law to monitor each bandwidth user after a satellite it built is in space. Except it's their infrastructure now.
- halter73 8y agoIf they don't own or control the satellite, it's not really their infrastructure when push comes to shove. China might have contracts guaranteeing bandwidth, but I doubt that matters much in an armed conflict.
- TheOtherHobbes 8y agoNothing would matter much in an armed conflict between the US and China.
- halter73 8y agoArmed conflict doesn't necessarily mean all out war.