4 ms·
I had an 8-bit micro, the Tandy (i.e. Radio Shack) Color Computer ("CoCo"), made in the mid 80s. I got an optional OS for it, called "OS9" but unrelated to App
by GeorgeKangas 7y ago
I had an 8-bit micro, the Tandy (i.e. Radio Shack) Color Computer ("CoCo"), made in the mid 80s.
I got an optional OS for it, called "OS9" but unrelated to Apple's OS9 (which came later).
OS9 had capabilities very similar to (and modeled on)Unix. Clearly, Linux or something a lot like it could also have run on the CoCo.
- orionblastar 7y agoTrs80 Coco series used the 6809 CPU that is 16 bits. The article talks about Linux on 8 bit systems. I'd say the Mega65 might be a good 8 bit machine to port Linux to. http://mega65.com http://mega65.com
- GeorgeKangas 7y agoThe 6809 was 8 bits, in the same way Z80 and 6502 and 6800 were: 8 bit data bus, 16 bit address bus. It had a few 16 bit instructions: arithmetic on data in registers, or loading/storing a 16 bit register (8 bits at a time). I think the Z80 did as well. Here's Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_6809 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_6809
- teilo 7y agoBut the 8069 is a microprocessor (CPU). This is a microcontroller. Radically different architecture and (typical) use case. They don't have MMUs because they are designed to directly address a much smaller ram space. On an the micro in the article, this is only 16K. They are also designed to execute machine code directly, and automatically from an on-board or external ROM, whether a masked ROM (rare these days), an EPROM, or an EEPROM/NVRAM of various kinds. They are not designed to use an OS at all. That's what makes this so impressive.