3 ms·

He finished the report, but he wasn't able to draw a conclusion on whether Trump colluded with Russia.

• polithrowaway 7y ago
  "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation"
  • daveFNbuck 7y ago
    Lack of evidence is not a conclusion. It's what you'd expect if there were successful obstruction of justice. Even Barr's summary quoted that the report "does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
    • polithrowaway 7y ago
      In America, you need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of a crime. It's innocent until PROVEN guilty with EVIDENCE. How do you fully exonerate someone of a claim that isn't true. You're asking them to prove a negative.