4 ms·
I would not consider converging economic interests ties. As those can change at any moment. I guess the whole war racketeering thing is the same thing, you dest
by devoply 7y ago
I would not consider converging economic interests ties. As those can change at any moment. I guess the whole war racketeering thing is the same thing, you destroy a country to rebuild it. If they are already doing that, letting you build it then what's the point of destroying it.
- AckSyn 7y ago> I would not consider converging economic interests ties. This seems to be exactly what 'ties' are, here.
- chillacy 7y agoI had assumed that in geopolitics the order goes: 1. Security interests 2. Economic interests 3. Shared values
- hedora 7y agoYou forgot: 0. Personal gain (At least until they start enforcing anti-bribery laws against the first family.)
- gremlinsinc 7y agoWhen did we start zero-indexing numbered lists?
- 0-_-0 7y agoYou must be a Pascal programmer