3 ms·

I've not anywhere argued that it hasn't been beneficial for people, but simply that it is not innovative. Here, Uber is just another private hire taxi. They ca

by IanCal 8y ago

I've not anywhere argued that it hasn't been beneficial for people, but simply that it is not innovative. Here, Uber is just another private hire taxi. They cannot pick up random people from the street (and be insured, anyway), so they would not be picking up random other fares on the way unless the dispatcher told them to. This is what has existed for a long time before Uber appeared, so replicating that elsewhere is not innovative surely?

kortilla 8y ago
>I've not anywhere argued that it hasn't been beneficial for people, but simply that it is not innovative. And that’s what’s making you look like a dolt. Taxis in most of the world were (and mostly still are) unreliable gambles that vary from city to city. Calling on the phone and waiting for 40 minutes without live tracking and automatic rerouting for when the driver decides to stop for groceries is a completely different level of usefulness. You just compared a flip phone to a smartphone (in more ways than one).