3 ms·
You seem to trying to express a negative response to the fact that these companies create design frameworks. I'm interested as to why you feel this way?
by wuliwong 7y ago
You seem to trying to express a negative response to the fact that these companies create design frameworks. I'm interested as to why you feel this way?
- Improvotter 7y ago>insert xkcd framework reference<
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- manigandham 7y agoThe post is just a copy of a copy: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17971337 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17971337 No real intent there. It's good to have large organizations donating libraries to open-source.
- TheAceOfHearts 7y agoI didn't read it that way at all, it's simply highlighting that there's a large number of options to chose from! It's great that more companies are publishing their design frameworks, although part of the reason for doing this is certainly to attract talent. Having partially reviewed a couple of these, I'd say quality varies quite a bit so be sure to dig through the code to see if you'd be comfortable helping maintain that. Always be sure to review the license! For example, Microsoft Fabric is MIT, but the assets (fonts and icons) are under a separate license.
- insomniacity 7y agoIn a way yes, it was about the utility and relevance of Yet Another Corporate Design System. I couldn't find what I really wanted to post, which was a list of all the abandoned Corporate Design Systems - I think I must have seen that in another comment.