If having a poor understanding of a problem constitutes "solving it", then we could be reckless in any area, and reap the consequences. Why would caution be no

If having a poor understanding of a problem constitutes "solving it", then we could be reckless in any area, and reap the consequences. Why would caution be not be demanded from a moral point of view? If morality places any value on the suffering of conscious beings, then the approach of "I don't know what will happen. Let's do this!" when conscious beings are the subject of an experiment is insane.