By calling my reasoning "daft", and by implying interventionism, many would assume a text book ad hominem. But I'm ok with a jab - if we all get overly sensitiv

By calling my reasoning "daft", and by implying interventionism, many would assume a text book ad hominem. But I'm ok with a jab - if we all get overly sensitive, and remove emotions from discourse, we're just denying our humanity. As for your counter points on my #2, #3, I've made it clear that it's "likely" for people to censor along the lines of their politics/options. I don't believe that to be unreasonable, especially when the censors aren't subject to any laws/regulations. And if there's ANY doubt in actual leftist bent inside Twitter, the company, here [1] is their CEO admitting to conservative employees being terrified to speak their mind. [1]: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/406927-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-conservative-employees-dont-feel-safe-to-express https://thehill.com/policy/technology/406927-twitter-ceo-jac...