3 ms·
>Also, I think that right now companies like Google and FB should be treated and reasoned about like states. To think that they will not abuse their power in on
by mthoms 8y ago
>Also, I think that right now companies like Google and FB should be treated and reasoned about like states. To think that they will not abuse their power in one way or the other - just like countries do - is also "a little" naive.
That companies this big ought to be reasoned about just like Nation States is a very interesting idea.
- arrosenberg 8y agoAlternatively, we could reject the notion entirely and revive the antitrust movement. Centralized private power is just as, if not more, dangerous than centralized public power and we aught to have a discussion about whether nation-state size companies are really a desirable feature.
- ericol 8y agoI think both the approaches in your comment and the one above (Or any comment to that matter) are worthy of a lengthy discussion. But my point was more directed towrds understanding how companies this big are starting to behave. I do think antitrust is a way to look at it, but the anti trust laws in the US I think are difficult to point towards Google for instance (Probably the same about European laws) > we aught to have a discussion about whether nation-state size companies are really a desirable feature I think it goes a way longer than that. Obviously private companies are subjected to a lot less scrutiny than states, but states do miss behave and do not run into the risk of eternal intervention, unless they really fuck up, and even then.
- eggsome 8y agoForcing mega corps to assume the responsibility of statehood is one of the key plot points in the "Poor mans fight" series of books. (some of the best sci-fi I've read in a while too).
- ericol 8y agoHey, thanks for that. Interesting. I'll take a look at those books.