My comment is not in a vacuum it’s a direct response to a comment that suggest regulation of a thing is improper because “people want to do it”. Your point is

My comment is not in a vacuum it’s a direct response to a comment that suggest regulation of a thing is improper because “people want to do it”. Your point is directly in line with mine...we can regulate things notwithstanding “people wanting to do it.” And that is not a reason to not regulate a thing, if people don’t agree with the merits of the proposed regulation, fine, but I think we both agree “because people want to do it” is not a reason to not regulate something. I’m not saying slack is a fraud...I’m not even saying it’s a bad investment. People have read all that in to a concept.