3 ms·
They don't need 20 years of anything; they simply needed a change in leadership, which they got. Satya is drastically changing the culture and with it the busi
by intern4tional 7y ago
They don't need 20 years of anything; they simply needed a change in leadership, which they got.
Satya is drastically changing the culture and with it the business. I get there are people out there that will always have an ax to grind (you seem to be one of those) but if you wait 20 years to trust a business again, you'll be left behind with any improvements or optimizations that happen in the meantime.
If Microsoft sustains its direction for a few more years at most, given the pace at which the industry they are in evolves, the legacy practices they had won't much matter.
- sametmax 7y agoThe way you see things leads to the society of today, where big companies have powers close to the state, and very little accountability. If it's ok to accumulate immense wealth and power by misbehaving for 20 years, and just with switching a head and orienting PR, it's all forgiven, then why not keep doing it ?
- whydoineedthis 7y agoLeft behind? I haven't been compelled to own or use a Microsoft product in 10 years. I would be surprised if it changed in the next 10.