2 ms·
> Your rebuttal would be just as unfounded as the theory you are dismissing. True enough, but that doesn't validate the higher-profile original either. Seems a
by notacoward 8y ago
> Your rebuttal would be just as unfounded as the theory you are dismissing.
True enough, but that doesn't validate the higher-profile original either. Seems a bit "well actually" TBH.
- Funes- 8y ago>that doesn't validate the higher-profile original either. You're right, it doesn't. I never said that, either. >Seems a bit "well actually" TBH I'm sorry if it came across that way, really. I like to be as precise as I can with everything I say, so it just came out that way naturally. Actually, one of the first replies I got here (not too long ago) was a similar kind of comment to the one we are discussing now. At first, my reaction was negative, as in "this guy is just trying to one-up me by nitpicking my comment"; then, I realized it was an opportunity to start to make myself as clear as possible whenever I wrote any other comments. Anyhow, I hope you can understand where I'm coming from.