3 ms·

I passed it at 7 and it wasn't easy. I have personal experience of it being nasty, anti-vaxxers mostly don't. They don't even know what they're talking about be

by mnl 7y ago

I passed it at 7 and it wasn't easy. I have personal experience of it being nasty, anti-vaxxers mostly don't. They don't even know what they're talking about because that's the whole point of their position, ignore every actual piece of knowledge about this and construct an very entertaining conspiracy that has no consequences until herd immunity crumbles. I don't even know why we're having this problem, we were on our way to eradicate measles, as we did with smallpox.

DataWorker 7y ago
I think they have plenty of science to back their thinking. That’s the bigger issue in my mind.
- nocha 7y ago
  Can you provide examples? The only example of a 'scientific' study I am aware of is the disgraced Wakefield stuff which has been disproven so many times it isn't even funny. That's before you add in the malpractice that happened and the conflict of interest he held.
  - bluGill 7y ago
    Some people have an allergic reaction. (probably 1 in a million). That is a scientific fact, and enough for them to get a lot of mileage.
  - aszantu 7y ago
    Someone said, that Merck is being sued for constructing evidence in vaccination fraud or something.
  - droithomme 7y ago
    Italian researchers tested 44 different vaccines and found significant contamination in all of them, ranging from red blood cells to lead, tungsten, gold, and chromium. The describe this finding as "baffling" and call for better purification and quality control, given that many of the contaminants were capable of causing health problems. "New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination" https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
  - DataWorker 7y ago
    I have not looked into any of this, so I tend to think it’s probably bunk since authorities dismiss it as such. Many others, it would seem, do not dismiss it. http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2007/06/no-evidence-of-any-link.html http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2007/06/no-evidence-o...

by mnl 7y ago

DataWorker 7y ago

I think they have plenty of science to back their thinking. That’s the bigger issue in my mind.

nocha 7y ago
Can you provide examples? The only example of a 'scientific' study I am aware of is the disgraced Wakefield stuff which has been disproven so many times it isn't even funny. That's before you add in the malpractice that happened and the conflict of interest he held.
- bluGill 7y ago
  Some people have an allergic reaction. (probably 1 in a million). That is a scientific fact, and enough for them to get a lot of mileage.
- aszantu 7y ago
  Someone said, that Merck is being sued for constructing evidence in vaccination fraud or something.
- droithomme 7y ago
  Italian researchers tested 44 different vaccines and found significant contamination in all of them, ranging from red blood cells to lead, tungsten, gold, and chromium. The describe this finding as "baffling" and call for better purification and quality control, given that many of the contaminants were capable of causing health problems. "New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination" https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
- DataWorker 7y ago
  I have not looked into any of this, so I tend to think it’s probably bunk since authorities dismiss it as such. Many others, it would seem, do not dismiss it. http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2007/06/no-evidence-of-any-link.html http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2007/06/no-evidence-o...