4 ms·
The implication was that if your pension is removed it's a non-issue because the state is providing you food and shelter on their own terms.
by dsfyu404ed 8y ago
The implication was that if your pension is removed it's a non-issue because the state is providing you food and shelter on their own terms.
- chrisseaton 8y ago> you'll keep your pension unless... In the government you can lose your pension. In the private sector you can't. In both cases you have state benefits. How's that a benefit of being in government?
- dsfyu404ed 8y agoBy "on their own terms" I meant prison. Like if you do something bad enough to lose your pension it's because you did something so bad that you're going to jail for the rest of your life.
- chrisseaton 8y agoI still don't get it. Even if I go to prison I don't lose my private sector pension. Government pensions are worse because they have the option of removing them. They can't do that in private sector because it's not part of any contract or company control - it's a trust.
- pnutjam 8y agonot all pensions are judgement proof