4 ms·
Why would they take it down? It's archived... mirror: https://gofile.io/?c=YOwVef https://gofile.io/?c=YOwVef
by purpleidea 7y ago
Why would they take it down? It's archived...
mirror:
https://gofile.io/?c=YOwVef https://gofile.io/?c=YOwVef
- rakoo 7y agoThey removed the detailed analysis but the conclusion remains the same and is perhaps even reinforced: "Samsung's Fold breaks easily, is not ready yet"
- lucasverra 7y agoProbably samsung wanting to erase some traces. All reviewers are shipping it back, probably mandatory [0]. [0]: https://youtu.be/TtpIzMhNtDE https://youtu.be/TtpIzMhNtDE
- dmitriid 7y ago> Why would they take it down? Why wouldn't you follow and read the link? It's three short paragraphs and the second paragraph describes in no uncertain terms why they took it down.
- FatalLogic 7y agoThe second paragraph describes why iFixit took it down, you are correct. But I think the GP's "they" means Samsung, not iFixit, and "why" means "why would Samsung do this stupid thing that will obviously attract attention to the issue"
- 14 7y agoYes perhaps we are seeing the Streisand effect in this situation?
- fernandotakai 7y agomy guess on why samsung did it: the leaker (as in, the person that gave ifixit the device) had an NDA with samsung and samsung is just enforcing it -- they are asking for them to take the teardown down instead of suing for breach. (of course, that's all a guess, i'm not even close to be a lawyer).