4 ms·
They hire you for whatever they hire you for. If you're hourly, sure what you said applies. Otherwise, no, they bought your brain. The game theory is to find
by diminoten 8y ago
They hire you for whatever they hire you for. If you're hourly, sure what you said applies. Otherwise, no, they bought your brain.
The game theory is to find the people who believe this, and to get rid of people who don't.
- yjftsjthsd-h 8y ago> Otherwise, no, they bought your brain. No, they rent some of it. Like a cloud host; you don't own the hardware, you're timesharing. > The game theory is to find the people who believe this, and to get rid of people who don't. Companies prefer to hire suckers if they can, yes.
- diminoten 8y agoDepends on your contact with your employer. If you're exempt and not hourly, they don't rent your brain for a period of time, they rent it to solve a set of problems. The volume those problems, and the rate they expect you to solve them at is up to your employer. Their only limit is to not assign you so much work you quit. That's it.
- speedplane 8y ago>> The game theory is to find the people who believe this, and to get rid of people who don't. > Companies prefer to hire suckers if they can, yes. Pretty cynical, no? Obviously employers make more money off their employees than they pay them, otherwise they wouldn't be in business, but that doesn't make an employee a sucker.
- notfromhere 8y agoAn employee is definitely a sucker if they indefinitely keep increasing output without a rise in compensation.
- diminoten 8y agoYou can't/won't justify a rise in compensation without increasing output first.