3 ms·
I think it's an ambiguous sentence with two possible interpretations: > Only 1 defender, [but any other player] is allowed in the end-gate circle at any time.
by ncallaway 8y ago
I think it's an ambiguous sentence with two possible interpretations:
> Only 1 defender, [but any other player] is allowed in the end-gate circle at any time.
> Only 1 defender, [and no other player] is allowed in the end-gate circle at any time.
I agree that it could use a clarification, but I think as you've noted the first interpretation doesn't make much sense in the game. If I were a referee of this sport, I would certainly interpret the rules as the second sentence.
So, if any forward entered the circle at any time, I would penalize them for that. I would use the fact that the rules that that only defenders are allowed in the end-gate, which implies that forwards are not allowed.
- kosievdmerwe 8y agoWell the ambiguity is "defender" meaning "a player on the defending team" and "a player with the role defender". Actually the second interpretation could have an interesting effect, since it also doesn't specify team. So if the attacking team puts one of their defenders in the circle the defending team is out of luck.