2 ms·

If their comments are consistently good then they should stand on their own merit. Else you just get idol worship and groupthink. Names are not as useful as yo

• ansible 7y ago
  > If their comments are consistently good then they should stand on their own merit. Else you just get idol worship and groupthink. > Names are not as useful as you think. Ummm... no. I don't have the time and desire to completely verify everything that everyone says in every forum that I look at. I doubt that anyone has time for that. So I will use shortcuts, as does every other human on the planet. One of these shortcuts is reputation. If someone has a good reputation with me, then that increases the credulity of everything they say. That doesn't mean that if one of the commentators I hold in high opinion says that "Goblins are behind the election hacking" I will just believe it. However, if one of these highly-esteemed commentators has an opinion about Docker vs. CoreOS Rkt, I will likely take them at their word, if it isn't a critical issue. This doesn't obviate me from doing my on research on technology decisions, but can help guide my efforts. I don't worship anyone or anything. Everyone's going to be wrong about something, but some are right more often than others, and should be given some benefit of the doubt.
• Tomte 7y ago
  Names are incredibly useful, because I know that tptacek does security, cpercival does cryptography and DannyBee does law. In a thread about legal issues I'll certainly put more weight towards DannyBee's comments, even if he might have totally wrong views on, say, beekeeping.