> A non-negligible portion of these people have what we today call learning disabilities. Well sure but if you do and if that doesn't make you 'a winner' it ma

> A non-negligible portion of these people have what we today call learning disabilities. Well sure but if you do and if that doesn't make you 'a winner' it makes you 'a loser' doesn't it? Point is if I have no athletic skills and can't play football or hockey or soccer 'because of disabilities' doesn't that make me 'a loser' in some way? The point is although people think that using the word 'loser' implies someone has control over the outcome but many times that is not the case. Often they have control but more often there is something else that is preventing them (family, abilities, intelligence) and so on.