3 ms·
Why should one avoid political commentary on HN? It's FULL of it. >"consensus" is quite a stretch Well, for everybody that's not related to LŽVS. >which I am
by tasubotadas 8y ago
Why should one avoid political commentary on HN? It's FULL of it.
>"consensus" is quite a stretch
Well, for everybody that's not related to LŽVS.
>which I am convinced is absolutely incorrect
You forgot to share the things why do you think that's
incorrect.
- wfn 8y ago> Well, for everybody that's not related to LŽVS. That is not true: there are people in BoL who do not share your view at all. How do you think the internal VILBOR report came about and resurfaced initially (BoL was later forced to publish it)? Unfortunately, we will have to be patient until the names and views of the people become public, if it comes to that. I hope it does, but there is also backlash and retribution for them awaiting from within BoL. I know this all sounds speculative, so the only thing I can ask is some patience. > You forgot to share the things why do you think that's incorrect. I can expand, but I do not think this is the place to do so. I also do not think I am capable of currently convincing you otherwise; I hope in time we shall see. I'll consider adding more details later. But my purpose in replying to you was to merely communicate that there is no definite consensus at all.
- wfn 8y agoFollowing up on your prompt: people and documents are resurfacing (and will continue to do so in the future), but for starters (these are internal LB reports and people, calling VILIBOR a cartel (possibly too strong a word)): https://www.15min.lt/verslas/naujiena/finansai/viena-nuomone-lietuvos-bankas-slepe-vilibor-vadino-iteisintu-karteliu-662-1136402 https://www.15min.lt/verslas/naujiena/finansai/viena-nuomone...