I have found no evidence that the author has changed their stance on this issue. You can find other issues that have also been closed with a brief explanation.

I have found no evidence that the author has changed their stance on this issue. You can find other issues that have also been closed with a brief explanation. If the author wants to show up and say otherwise, I'm happy to take correction. But, I'd rather have a robust implementation of a speculatively less secure scheme then have the undelivered promise of a more secure scheme papering over an insecure implementation.