Hi. I did not mean to judge the software itself. It probably is very good. I was only airing my concern when a mistake of this kind was made. It is not this spe

Hi. I did not mean to judge the software itself. It probably is very good. I was only airing my concern when a mistake of this kind was made. It is not this specific thing that was reverted that prompted several people to voice their concern - it is this category of mistake. If the author thinks it is okay to pin up an ad to the headers, what other silly and immature things would the author like to do in future?! That is the line of thought that puts me off. This is not to say people don't correct their mistakes. I will of course take this software on its merit, but as I said in my original comment, I will now be extra careful before choosing this software for anything I care deeply about, and if I don't have such time, I simply will take the hard way and use something else. A mistake like this does not provoke irrevocable loss of trust to me. This category of mistake warrants a big red beware sign in front of the product. I don't think that's bad.