3 ms·

You shod drop the second paragraph. It doesn't help your case.

by lugg 7y ago

zaroth 7y ago
I’m not sure a case is being made at all. A massive investigation turned up no criminal conspiracy and failed to substantiate a charge of obstruction. I’m really not sure what ‘spaceheretostay’ is on about.
- spaceheretostay 7y ago
  > A massive investigation turned up no criminal conspiracy That is definitely not true. > failed to substantiate a charge of obstruction This is also not true. The events are ongoing, the investigation has not 'failed' in any way. > I’m really not sure what ‘spaceheretostay’ is on about. I think I've made my points clearly. Abuses of power that are clearly illegal are common at the top of our government, and it happens because they openly commit crimes that they know will take years to investigate, during which times the goals of their illegal activities can be met. That is a direct example that directly relates to the parent comment in this thread. I've tried to be as clear as possible.
  - dang 7y ago
    Would you please stop using HN for political battle? It's off topic here, and you've been doing it a lot. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- aldoushuxley001 7y ago
  Yeah he sounds very ideologically motivated and when pressed to backup his claims of crimes being committed completely failed to back them up. Seems par for the course for people to sling all sorts of accusations without backing them up these days, which is unfortunate because it's largely just toxic.
spaceheretostay 7y ago
I think that choosing to ignore seemingly-willful-ignorance of major national and global issues is not helpful to anyone. I replied in clear words with facts about where to find more information. I also see it important to note that the information is extremely widely publicized in the last few weeks especially.

3 ms·

You shod drop the second paragraph. It doesn't help your case.

by lugg 7y ago

You shod drop the second paragraph. It doesn't help your case.

zaroth 7y ago
I’m not sure a case is being made at all. A massive investigation turned up no criminal conspiracy and failed to substantiate a charge of obstruction. I’m really not sure what ‘spaceheretostay’ is on about.
- spaceheretostay 7y ago
  > A massive investigation turned up no criminal conspiracy That is definitely not true. > failed to substantiate a charge of obstruction This is also not true. The events are ongoing, the investigation has not 'failed' in any way. > I’m really not sure what ‘spaceheretostay’ is on about. I think I've made my points clearly. Abuses of power that are clearly illegal are common at the top of our government, and it happens because they openly commit crimes that they know will take years to investigate, during which times the goals of their illegal activities can be met. That is a direct example that directly relates to the parent comment in this thread. I've tried to be as clear as possible.
  - dang 7y ago
    Would you please stop using HN for political battle? It's off topic here, and you've been doing it a lot. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- aldoushuxley001 7y ago
  Yeah he sounds very ideologically motivated and when pressed to backup his claims of crimes being committed completely failed to back them up. Seems par for the course for people to sling all sorts of accusations without backing them up these days, which is unfortunate because it's largely just toxic.
spaceheretostay 7y ago
I think that choosing to ignore seemingly-willful-ignorance of major national and global issues is not helpful to anyone. I replied in clear words with facts about where to find more information. I also see it important to note that the information is extremely widely publicized in the last few weeks especially.