It's an interesting dilemma for the consumer when subsequent failure happens so soon after repair. If the product is under warranty, original or extended, I thi

It's an interesting dilemma for the consumer when subsequent failure happens so soon after repair. If the product is under warranty, original or extended, I think the equivalent of automobile Lemon Law should apply: consumer is entitled to a permanent fix, manufacturer is entitled to three attempts to do so within 90 days; if it's still not working or subsequently fails, the consumer is entitled to a 100% refund. I'm not aware of that being the case in any U.S. state. How does a consumer protect whatever rights they have? 50% off an external keyboard isn't good enough but people have work to do. Why bother getting yet another "fix" when it too likely fails in a few months? I'd want to make sure that if my warranty is about to expire that I've got documentation that Apple agrees the defect exists and that I'm entitled to a better permanent fix. Consumer protection laws are important. This finders keepers nonsense makes people angry and they aren't just going to reduce their trust in Apple, their trust in the industry and society is diminished as well.