3 ms·
Just to be clear: it seems that the same exact binaries distributed via a docker image or through standard distro packages managers are free for commercial use.
by TAForObvReasons 7y ago
Just to be clear: it seems that the same exact binaries distributed via a docker image or through standard distro packages managers are free for commercial use. The difference is that obtaining it from you directly costs money. This is a part of the business model that HN users would likely find distasteful. You're charging people who aren't technically competent enough to realize that other places offer the same exact binaries for free. Why even permit the side channels in the first place?
- mholt 7y agoThat's also an incorrect characterization. Those 3rd-party channels do not give you the power to customize Caddy the way our build infrastructure does. Try customizing Caddy with plugins through apt or DO images and let us know if you find a way to do that!
- gtirloni 7y agoI understand other projects have similar compilation requirements but now you're just spinning a technical difficulty as a feature. The fact people are still having trouble understanding your licensing terms should give you pause.